Did Spanish really brutally enslave and murder Native Americans

That goes even without saying, we are told… The brutal Spanish conquistadors, enslavement, rape and pillage, Spanish Inquisition, and all that.

We are told about these in history books. We are reminded of the brutality of the Spanish conquest of the Americas over and over. How Cortez and his 300-500 men brutally conquered an entire continent, how scared the Natives were of his guns, and so on. Even if ~300 men conquering an entire continent sounds a little… well… ‘exaggerated’… Especially if one has any reading into the history of warfare…


Join My Mailing List Here:
(you will also get updates when a new posts are out)

It does sound exaggerated because when you actually delve into the recorded history, you end up discovering that it is patently false. Along with a lot of other ‘historical facts’ that we are repeatedly told. The actual written and verifiable history shows an orthogonally different reality than what is commonly portrayed in popular literature, all the way from the start, and things just keep unfolding.

Let’s have a look and go through the myths one by one, from enslavement to genocide

We find that Spanish King Fernando II signed a decree as early as 1512, which declared Native Americans as ‘free men’, and mandated that they would be paid a fair wage for any job they were employed in. (Laws of BurgosThis happened even before first reports of wide-scale and systematic maltreatment of Natives started to come in. At this point remember that Columbus himself had been recalled and died in disgrace and poverty as a result of the maltreatment of natives during his stint.

It wasn’t Cortez and his men who massacred the ~200,000 Aztecs when Tenochtitlan was conquered by ~1000 Spaniards and their ~80,000 Native American allies – it was their allies. People whose relatives, even family members were taken as tribute by Aztecs and were massacred or were eaten in ritual slaughter, or were kept as food stock to be eaten in famines. These people didn’t have any mercy for their Aztec compatriots. It’s questionable whether Cortez and his men would want to stop their allies after knowing what the Aztecs did to them, and it’s totally questionable that they could.

When Cortez was recalled back to Spain in 1528, the remaining colonial administrator, Guzman, engages in pillaging, enslavement, and wars against the Native American populations. Then Cortez returns with a bunch of judges. Spanish had been insisting that natives keep written records of history, which they were not doing until then. The first written records that the natives created during Guzman’s stint are used as evidence against him and Native Americans testify as witnesses in court for his crimes. The court condemns and sentences Guzman, who is sent back to Spain in chains as a traitor and enemy of the crown for his crimes against Native Americans.

One of the judges not only rails against the slavery of natives in his reports to the Spanish crown but also proceeds to repair and rebuild the native communities with his own money. He sets up advanced communities in which Native Americans are taught European technical skills, but their native culture is preserved. They rule themselves and are called “Republicas de Indios”.

To top that, In 1542, a Spanish humanist, las Casas, succeeded in persuading the Spanish court, nobility, and clergy that Indians could not be treated as subhumans and could not be subjected to slavery, based on humanitarian arguments, leading to Native Americans to be declared Spanish subjects with equal standing with Spaniards. (New Laws) This is a major feat since such a result could only come with the broad agreement of the crown, top nobility, and the clergy, not just the crown itself. This means that the majority of the Spanish establishment agreed with these humanist arguments.

Bartolomé de las Casas

Again, in 1550, he won another debate against private interests who were arguing that Natives were subhuman and therefore needed ‘masters’ to ‘civilize’.

Local nobility and establishment tried to circumvent these decrees to the extent they could, to exploit and prosper at the expense of Natives, rebelled against the New Laws under the leadership of Pizzaro’s half-brother Gonzalo Pizzaro who ruled major regions as a noble, but then this led to Spanish crown recalling then appointed viceroy and sending a viceroy who was specifically tasked with implementing these laws, who beat Pizzaro and executed him. Even if the crown was not able to fully assert all the laws it issued due to resistance from local nobility, it still succeeded in granting immense protection, rights, and comparable equality for its native subjects.

As a result, there are 6 million~ pure-blooded Incans today, Native Americans are either the majority in numerous South American countries or constitute significant segments inside the population in others, and there are entire races of mixed European-Native ancestry which we call Mexicans and other South Americans.

Compare this to North America, where someone is counted as being ‘Native American’ if s/he has 1/40 Native American blood, solely because the Anglo establishment eradicated an entire continent.

Such arguments as Las Casas made were unimaginable in Anglosphere. There wasn’t even such an ongoing debate – native Americans were subhuman, and because they weren’t even good for using as slaves (they knew the land and escaped), it was better to totally eradicate them. This fit in totally with the agenda of chartered colonization companies because it maximized their profit, and the English crown because it maximized the share it got from those profits and the trade.

But, it wasn’t only Las Casas who was in contrast with the Anglo-literature propaganda that goes back to the Elizabethan age. Spanish actions and deeds in South America from the start spark a large contrast to what is claimed by that literature:

1 – Brutal conquistadors

They were only ~300–500 people. As any student of history would know, 300 people can never conquer an entire continent even if they were actually brutal.

The reality is that it was the Spanish conquistadors and their Indian allies who conquered the Aztecs. In the last pitched battles, the Aztec army numbered towards 100,000~, and the alliance army that fought them also numbered around the same 100,000~ mark. Spanish was just a part of that army, and they were leading the army as the alliance leaders.

And, they did it spectacularly well, through strategy, diplomacy, and all the traits which the anglo-literature deprives them of; for it takes a lot of diplomatic skill to lead hundreds of different tribes which had numerous enmities among themselves that go back to hundreds of years and unite them in a cohesive military operation. By the way, Europe has never seen any military operation that big like these ones, from ancient Rome to the Early Modern Age. It is a major feat in many ways.

There was a factor that united all these tribes and allied them with the Spanish: their hatred of the Aztecs.

The Aztecs, who were sacrificing up to ~100,000 people yearly, empire-wide, including children.

As you can understand, after a hundred or so years of having your youth, women, and children murdered in altars, camaraderie towards the fellow natives who rule you goes out of the window. As such, many local tribes and kingdoms were utterly hating the Aztecs with their guts.

The brutality that a segment of the Aztec population was subjected to after the fall of their empire, therefore, becomes very easy to understand – it wasn’t something that was propagated by the ~300–500 conquistadors, it would necessitate hundreds of thousands of people seeking revenge for their people slaughtered in the altars.

2 – Spanish treatment of Natives

In contrast to what Anglo-sphere used to do with natives, seeing them as non-human and treating them as such, the Spanish treated them as equals:

  • Conquistadors immediately started marrying into native nobility to establish legitimacy as rulers. This is something unthinkable in the anglosphere. Incidentally, it is the start of today’s mestizo (mixed) races in South America.
  • Combined with the decree of 1512 which declared Native Americans as free men, conquistadors marrying into the nobility from the start, and especially later laws declaring Native Americans as Spanish subjects, marriage between Spaniards and natives was not only now legal but also socially acceptable. As a result, today we have a country called Mexico which is populated by 125 million people, all of which are either mestizos or totally/partially pure-blooded Native Americans. There is no such phenomenon in North America, where Native Americans were actually eradicated.
  • While Native American kingdoms’ top governance was replaced with a viceroy, many kingdoms and their administration were left intact. Conquistadors and early viceroys only changed top administration, though middle-level administration was also replaced by Spaniards or Mestizos in later times, the majority of Native American culture, institutions, and governance were kept.
  • So much so that the Spanish crown granted autonomy to major tribes which allied with them. These Indian kingdoms were subject to the Spanish crown in foreign policy but totally independent in their internal affairs. This went on until the early 19th century.
  • Natives and Mestizos consisted part of the Spanish empire’s institutions, ranging from its bureaucracy in New Spain to even its navy: The biggest, most successful privateer in history isn’t Drake, Kidd, or Hawkins, it is a mestizo, Miguel Enríquez, who was such a successful privateer that he operated a fleet of 300 ships at the top of his career, and he was ennobled for his deeds. He was awarded with various medals and exceptions for his service, and his fleet was also functioning as a courier network for the Spanish crown. The impact of Miguel on the merchant and naval power of the other powers in the region was such that it is said the Spanish king stated that he only needed a few more people like Enrique and he wouldn’t need a navy.
  • Aside from the early plagues brought from Europe, no native population under Spain’s control risked eradication or ethnic cleansing: The native populations of western and southwestern North America started to disappear only after they came under Anglosphere domination through the United States, whereas they did not suffer any such genocide during Spanish or Mexican rule. The same applies to the native peoples in central North America, under French rule.

3 – Spanish treatment of New Spain

Spanish declared and treated New Spain as a part of Spain. Not as a colony, or a land to exploit.

  • Over 23 universities were opened in New Spain, all of which were open to Native Americans. The first university was founded in 1538.
  • In 1580, by the order of the Spanish Crown, Indigenous languages departments were set up in Mexico and Lima universities, with the purpose of studying and teaching indigenous languages. Indigenous languages were not only kept but also studied and taught extensively.
  • Even as late as the early 19th century, Spain was still spending tax revenue on infrastructure building in New Spain, building it up as a part of Spain itself – buildings, roads, bridges, and whatever you may think of. Doing such instead of solely exploiting and sucking the land dry as English colonizers did, was a significant factor in the weakening of the Spanish power since it drained funds from the crown’s coffers.


There are many other sub-topics that can be examined here, however, these main points go beyond the needed arguments which would explain the great disparage between actual historical reality and Anglosphere-propagated narrative.

Why is there such a narrative in Anglosphere?

Simply because of the fact that when Elizabethan establishment tried the ‘Look how evil they are, look how we are the torch bearers of freedom’ propaganda to legitimize their political position and interests and vilify their enemy, it worked.

And as you have possibly immediately noticed, this propaganda mechanic stayed exactly the same throughout 500 years, and it is still employed by the Anglosphere establishment today – ranging from invasions in the Middle East to economic/clandestine warfare against any targeted country.

The propaganda, as you can judge from recent history, is effective both abroad and at home – it easily persuades the citizens of its own country that they are ‘the good guys’, due to the tendency in mankind to be on the good side, and abroad it easily instills doubt about and even successes in vilifying the targeted country.

Naturally, those who grow up in Anglosphere or anglosphere-influenced countries with a never-ending torrent of ‘we are the good guys, they are the bad guys’ in every topic of history including the colonization era, grow up with a view of reality that is practically manufactured at the expense of actual history. And naturally, these people find ‘outrageous acts’ of the rival establishments as things that require justice, but the civilization-scale genocidal acts of their own establishment as ‘mistakes’, or just ‘happenings’.

Just like how the majority of North American Native American populations have stayed virtually intact under the rule of French, Spanish, and Mexican establishments for ~300 years and did not get wiped out by epidemics, but they suddenly started suffering epidemics which wiped them out when they fell under United States rule…

An epidemic, indeed, but not an epidemic of the biological kind.

Nice Day for a Genocide: Shocking Quotes on Indians By US Leaders

This historical information by no means justifies or rationalizes the conquest of the New World…

By Spain, Portugal, or anyone else…

Conquest cannot be justified – if some ‘superior’ alien civilization would attempt to conquer you today, ‘for your own good’, you would resist with all you have.

As a result, this information does not support any ultra-nationalist or extremist viewpoint. Neither can it be used for that purpose in any way whatsoever.

What it does, however, is to just set the historical record straight to free it of the extreme bias of a particular establishment.

4 thoughts on “Did Spanish really brutally enslave and murder Native Americans”

  1. It is an indisputable fact that Spaniards wiped out entire civilizations throughout the Americas, so why are you spewing apologist nonsense lacking in veracity on this mendacious blog?

    Only 5 percent of the slave trade was in the United States so let’s be clear when we talk about that horror and expose that 95 percent of the slave trade from Spain and Portugal went to the rest of the new world to support their desire for development and pillaging of natural resources and farming.

    • Who says it is an ‘indisputable fact’. The English, literally.

      Otherwise not only there are many native-majority areas in South America, but also those who are called ‘Mexicans’ are literally the marriage of Spaniards and locals.

  2. King Fernando consept of free is the same as the USA which is not allowing anyone to be free. People are afraid to be themselves. You know of the fear giving laws that exist. Money causes bondage not freedom. King Fernando was lying like usual to people. That decree has nothing to do with what Jesus obeyed, recorded in scripture. Money enslaved people. Indians were free when the white man was not here. Indians knew they were being lied to with that decree.
    Cortez and judges. We need to judge ourselves even as Jesus judged himself. Jesus did not instruct us to have human judges over others. Money enslaves all. Devils are blind and dumb.

    Laws as they were called were the doctrines the commandments of men, not God’s laws.

    Mixed races are another lie. We are humans. Satan’s spirit came to this continent.

    To call money profit is to call God a liar saying he gave to us every good gift from above. Those things make us to be rich. Indians were rich.

    Spanish and Indians could not counsel the Aztec people saying we are made in the creator’s image. Harm that image. Harm the creator. Both are connected. Wisdom was absent – non- existent in the people who came here. That made war the only thing to leaned upon. God’s law was not in their mind. Thus, it was not taught.

    Jesus called tax collectors sinners. What does that make money to be?

    Justice: Jesus is the King of peace, and the Judge of all. Compassion is found in the justice Jesus talks about through us. People think a heavy hand. Money brings injustice. People are punished when they don’t have enough money.

  3. People who say that this is deep, are rising up from a deep dark hole into mind enlightening light.


Leave a Comment