Bernie Sanders is understating the danger of Inequality – they are not ‘challenges’ – they are existential threats to everyone, especially the rich

Take a look at the picture painted by the references below:

America’s dirty little secret: 42 million people are suffering from hunger

Were there any American citizens living on US soil who died because they couldn’t afford healthcare?

Focus – The price of insulin is killing Americans

Too poor to retire, too young to die

US is falling back to 3rd world country status: While a very tiny minority lives in extravagant luxury and hoards billions of dollars of wealth, which they can never reasonably spend on this planet, a growing number of Americans are suffering under 3rd world conditions which are speedily moving towards the conditions of the poor majority in other nations.

These are not‘challenges’ as Bernie Sanders put it; they are society-level dangers and they threaten the very fabric of society.

After a certain point, these types of dangers utterly destroy a society, creating a chaos which can only be stabilized by a popular movement which would shuffle all the cards. This may or may not be something that everyone can agree with.

But ironically, the biggest threat of such chaos is to the extravagant rich, who sociopathically try to hoard even more at the cost of the lives of their compatriots: After a while, that poverty-stricken majority will seek a way out – and they will back whichever movement that gives them actual hope and results. Even if it is led by those who are actually radical, religiously extreme, psychopathic, those who are willing to risk World War 3 – it doesn’t matter – these people do need to find a way out of their situation.

A religious extremist movement is also an option – religion may easily fill in the vacuum by aiding people like it does in many countries with such inequality. Or it may even only sell religious relief, and even if it doesn’t address the inequality and suffering, it may help ease the mental burden people are suffering as a result.

In such an environment the rich elite find themselves in the position of being the outcast, hated minority; their lifestyle does not fit with the increasingly extreme religious atmosphere. But not only the rich become a focus of hatred, secular society, atheists, academics, people who live ‘promiscuous’ lives, people who are ‘too modern’, people who don’t look ‘pious enough’ – they end up being among the first ones to get thrown under the bus.

The rising religious elite takes over not only the control from the old elite, but also the wealth – through prosecutions for tax evasion, through economic measures, discrimination, the old elite in such countries find themselves persecuted, impoverished and totally cast out.

Its an “Either you are with us, or you are against us” situation – if you don’t play along with the rising religious extremism, you are persecuted as ‘other’.

There is no exception to this phenomenon – religious or ideological, in every country which went to extremes in economic inequality, this happened. From the Islamist Iranian Revolution to all kinds of minor religious extremist takeovers in the Middle East, to the increasingly radicalizing nationalist atmosphere in India, to Nazi Germany: All follow the same pattern.

The most ironic is the state of the conservative elite – these people, normally seen in the conservative or religious spectrum in normal times, increasingly become marginalized and seen as ‘not religious enough’ due to increasingly radicalizing religious atmosphere. If they do not comply and become more extremist, they are persecuted as well.

And it’s not a phenomenon of the future either – it is already happening:

Former US House Speaker, John Boehner, who was considered far to the right, had to quit his speaker position citing that‘in this environment of extreme radicalism, he could not keep serving as speaker anymore’. Paul Ryan, who arrived on a tide of rising extremism which was spearheaded by the Tea Party, took over the position.

The main driving force of recent GOP resurgence has been the Tea Party, which since then has become mainstream, and the main force in that movement are extremist evangelists who believe things that are disturbing not only among the US elite, but also the entire world: Atheists must be jailed, or even killed, homosexuals the same, even the ‘leftists’ (liberals, actually anyone who doesnt go along with them), that the earth is flat, and for the 2nd coming of Jesus of Nazareth, Israel must be propped up first and then destroyed by Arab states.

Boehner, the“extremist” couldn’t tolerate it. He couldn’t fit in.

None of the current American elite, liberal or conservative, will fit in either. Except for a very tiny minority who are already extreme. The attempts to appear to fit in don’t work either –your past history will be dug up and you are outed and persecuted, or you are expected to totally fit in with ever increasing extremism, and when you can’t keep up, you are outed and persecuted.

………

Most furtive are the attempts to keep the status quo by pushing the same neoliberal policies through by whatever means:

Such is the case of Harris, Warren, Buttigeg, et al, who are open or closet neoliberals with neoliberal history, neoliberal backers, and who would either water down or outright abandon any fix they may promise – if they promise anything at all – upon the bidding of vested interests…

These are in fact the most dangerous in that they only exacerbate the situation by keeping the status quo, and as the wound festers and starts to boil, they keep a facade of normalcy, or at least a false promise that things will keep going as they are.

Things can’t continue as they are now. Even if the status quo is kept through outright fascism and repression, things eventually boil and fester. It ends up worse, because by trying to artificially keep the status quo going for 5–10 years more, the dynamic caused by inequality gets ever stronger and the resulting explosion is much more devastating.

…….

What we are seeing in the current Democratic primaries is that the vested interests and the minority elite are heavily pushing the status quo via status quo candidates. By hook or crook, they are trying to keep things as they are.

They don’t want to part with a few percent of the trillions of dollars of hoarded wealth, even if the cost will be a total breakdown of their society and their own way of life. Which, in the case of the US, a country with over 4000 nuclear warheads, may even bring about a world war and end all of  civilization.

That’s not an ideological behavior, that’s not something economic, that’s not even something sane – this behavior comfortably fits in spectrum of obsessive-compulsive disorders like hoarding.

…..

So, Sanders is indeed understating the danger.

Leave a Comment

Sign up for updates from Ozgur Zeren

Subscribe to Ozgur Zeren's mailing list to get notified when something new is posted.